Andrew Brucker in Board Operations on October 18, 2010
It's revenge plain and dingle" Their stated reason for objecting to the sale is their belief that the president should stay in the building and “suffer” along with other shareholders because of the mortgage (and high debt service) that the president so strongly advocated.
Our mantra in advising boards is that their decisions should always be reasonable, consistent, made in good faith and with a view as to what is best for the shareholders and the corporation. We preach this to the individual board members as well. We do not want anyone to accuse the board, or any of its members, of “bad faith.”
Even the Business Judgment Rule, which protects board decisions from judicial review, requires that decisions be made in “good faith.”
In our case, the two board members acted out of vengeance only. There was no concern for the actual financial background of the purchaser. There was no concern for the specific transaction, or for the good of the cooperative. The only concern these two shareholders had was to make the president miserable, and to disrupt her life. This sort of thinking is dangerous, and can only lead to problems.
Andrew Brucker is a partner at Schechter & Brucker
Engage, enrage, ask questions and give answers with your community of board members. Submit your questions and comments here!
Thinking of buying a co-op or condo? Already bought, and not sure how co-op/condo life and rules work? Learn all about purchasing a place and living in your new community. It's not like renting, and its not like owning a house. What's it like?