Steven Troup in Board Operations on December 25, 2012
It was about six months later, during a massive storm. Water again penetrated the roof into the apartment, causing substantial damage to the shareholder's improvements and personal property. The board shortly thereafter completed a long-planned roof replacement. The roof is now leak-free. However, the unit-owner has sued the board for damages to the apartment caused by that leak.
Patching a roof is obviously not as good as replacement. Since the replacement project had long been planned, thus demonstrating that the board was aware that the existing roof had weakness(es), it would have been better to await the replacement rather than patching before authorizing the construction to begin. However, the co-op board had tried to accommodate a new shareholder's desire to move in as quickly as possible.
Hindsight is, of course, 20-20. The board is insured, and may or may not have recourse against the contractor who performed the patch job, but the litigation creates additional expenses and diverts attention from more positive things that a co-op or condo board might be looking at.
Steven Troup is a partner at Tarter Krinsky & Drogin.
Photo by Carol Ott
Engage, enrage, ask questions and give answers with your community of board members. Submit your questions and comments here!
Co-op and condo board business broken down into bite-sized bits - 2 stories each week. Read now on all digital devices.