As part of our Problem Solved series, Habitat spoke with Cameron Lory, director of operations at Architecture Restoration Conservation.
Projects designed to benefit everyone in a building can be challenging enough, but when a project benefits only those who decide to participate, it can get even tougher. You worked with a co-op on the Upper West Side that successfully got one off the ground. What’s the story?
We developed a master plan for an Upper West Side co-op on 98th Street – a prewar, six-story, 31-residential-unit building – to install a split air conditioning system that would allow individual units to cool their apartments. The system consists of an outdoor condensing or compression unit that is connected to a cassette unit inside each apartment. It’s the equivalent of going from window air conditioners to central air.
So the master plan was for the entire building, even though not everyone wanted to participate?
Well, this was an interesting project because there was a limited group of forward-thinking shareholders that formed a grassroots movement to fund our work. They understood that they would pay upfront to have a master plan in place for all the units, and that other people who came along and put in units later might or might not contribute to the fund.
What were the challenges?
The master plan called for locating all these condensing units on the roof. It’s a beautiful building and you have 31 of these units, and you wouldn’t want any of them on the street facade. But there’s also limited space on the roof, because there are city and fire codes that require a great deal of open space. There were also seismic considerations. This is an older building with a wood-frame roof, so we don't have a concrete deck to fasten to. So the design and layout of the platforms for the system connections were difficult to come up with. The master plan was a way of getting this done right so that everybody could have their units up there at some point in time.
So let’s say you’re on the third floor and the compressor is on the roof. How does the refrigerant get to your apartment?
With these split systems, that wiring is called the bundle. Some of the apartments can access the air conditioner units on the roof through the central courtyard or an off-street facade. We found that other apartments don't have any real estate that's connected to a part of the building where it's acceptable to run these bundles of wiring of refrigerant and condensate. But we actually were able to enlarge a space within the building itself to run them directly to those apartments.
(Like what you're reading? To get Habitat newsletters sent to your inbox for free, click here.)
All of this was included in the original master plan?
It was a two-phased master plan. We first did a feasibility study, and then we laid out how everything gets installed. So we did a proof of concept, and then we figured out all the details for the next phase.
If other buildings were interested in pursuing something like this, what advice would you offer them?
Obviously, the first thing is you’ve got to know your building and understand the basic infrastructure. How much electrical supply is there? In this case, there's not an endless supply because they have a very limited line into the building. So we had to design the units to limit the amount of power each apartment drew. You also need to take into consideration the maintenance requirements for your building, such as how old your roof is and when you’re planning to replace it.
Would you suggest having a separate alteration agreement?
This building has an alteration agreement for interior restoration projects, but there’s a separate alteration agreement that's just for the master plan that calls for pre-installation meetings. That way we know that the installer is implementing things properly for each unit. It can also mean reduced fees for the building, because if installers are following the master plan, we don’t have to do a lot of work reviewing the alterations. A separate alteration agreement can also build a service component into the agreement so that the AC systems are maintained properly. So I would say those are the three things that we found that this building did right. The project is working out very well.
Are there any other takeaways that boards should consider?
I think the biggest takeaway is that split system AC units are a way they can reduce energy use in the building. They’re more efficient, and as the city is going more and more towards finding ways to reduce the use of gas and fossil fuels in buildings, this is a very good way to head in that direction. Also, you want to guarantee equitable access to the building's roof. A great deal of planning has to go into this so that everybody gets the benefit – not just the first person who planted his flag up there.
Engage, enrage, ask questions and give answers with your community of board members. Submit your questions and comments here!
Co-op and condo board business broken down into bite-sized bits - 2 stories each week. Read now on all digital devices.