Frank Lovece in Board Operations on October 11, 2013
Benjamin E. Epps, who had been a music producer in the 1980s, Amy Monroe and their son lived in duplex apartment B-3 at 615 East 11th Street (above), part of the 12-unit, two-building Del Este Village IV condominium. There seems to have been some silly misunderstanding in the mid-2000s, since Epps — who around this time had been condo board president — had a private deck installed on the common-area roof, even though he and Monroe had not gotten, as the condo's rules required, the board's prior written consent.
It's unclear from court documents if Epps was still board president on May 15, 2007, when the board send him and Monroe a letter saying the couple had constructed the deck with neither permission nor a construction permit. They hadn't even submitted an alteration agreement, as required by the condominium bylaws. And one can certainly forgive the board for mentioning it had no information about the safety or quality of the construction, or whether the couple had bought enough insurance in case the deck created a liability.
Documented. Sort of.
Still, hold on, said Epps: When I was board president we had a building-wide meeting in November 2005 where the unit-owners discussed roof decks "and ultimately voted on the proposal that the building take all necessary steps to formally allow the use of the rooftop for decks." In fact, it passed 10 - 2! Why, to prove it, here's this handwritten note by an unidentified person who tallied the vote. Don't pay attention to the fact it's dated Oct. 31, 2005, before the meeting took place.
That chronological anomaly aside, the board responded that the unit-owners did not, in fact, vote on a proposal to construct roof decks but had simply voted “to allow for exploration of the exploration of the issue." Indeed, the minutes of the November 2005 meeting say:
Regardless, Epps told the court that in his capacity as board president, he "assisted" the board in "researching and implementing projects of the building which affect common elements of the building" and to that end "took the responsibility of implementing [a] roof deck" in Spring 2007. He claimed the board chose the contractor and that the roof deck didn't require permits from the Department of Buildings or any other city agency.
It's Lonely at the Top
No one other than board-prez Epps had installed roof decks, though, and in a June 2007 e-mail to homeowners, the board wrote;
Since even the board conceded there had been "a confused and hurried vote" of some sort at some point, the water does appear to be a little muddied. But not that muddied, and certainly not so muddy that Judge Judith J. Gische wouldn't grant the board a preliminary injunction in April 2008 forbidding the apartment-owners and anyone connected to them "from entering upon and/or utilizing, for any purpose or reason, the roof structure on the premises."
Since then? The three-bedroom, two-bath duplex was advertised as a rental last year. Among its amenities — dishwasher, separate laundry room, copious closets, pet-friendly building — there is no mention of a roof deck.
Co-op and condo board business broken down into bite-sized bits - 2 stories each week. Read now on all digital devices.
A free digital resource for co-op/condo board directors. Published twice a month. Read now on all digital devices.