Eric M. Goidel in Board Operations on November 13, 2012
When the co-op began legitimate cases, they were often dismissed because they were not started in a timely manner — within 90 days of discovery. On occasion, residents pointed to other neighbors who had subsequently acquired pets but were not being similarly prosecuted, arguing that there was ongoing selective enforcement.
Notwithstanding a no-pet policy, the development was being overrun with pets and had limited remedies.
We advised the board to change its policy to allow one pet per apartment and require an application and identification process with licensing by management (dog tags) and with a picture of the pet placed in the apartment file.
Certain breeds were prohibited and the permissible size of future pets was regulated. A New York City pet license, as well as cooperative apartment renters insurance, was required.
Additionally, we recommended that an annual fee be paid by residents to deal with extra maintenance and landscaping expenses.
Residents who acquired pets without submitting to this process or residents who acquired more than one pet could now be subject to legal action. Pets that posed a nuisance could still be removed from the property. Shareholders could also be billed for damage to the development's property.
Eric M. Goidel is a partner at Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel
Photo by Carol Ott
Engage, enrage, ask questions and give answers with your community of board members. Submit your questions and comments here!
Co-op and condo board business broken down into bite-sized bits - 2 stories each week. Read now on all digital devices.
A free digital resource for co-op/condo board directors. Published twice a month. Read now on all digital devices.