Condominium Retail Units: Why Boards Should Avoid Standard Leasing Forms

New York City

April 4, 2014 — Leases of stores in the retail portions of residential condominiums need to be significantly revised from the standard form used by many lawyers. Why? Simply put, a shopping center lease will not work in a condominium context. The boards of condominiums containing retail space should be sure their broker's term sheet and their lawyer's draft lease treats these basic condominium issues.

(Note that in cases described below, the condominium does not rent its retail spaces directly to businesses. Rather, the commercial condo unit has been sold to a landlord who then rents it to retail tenants.)

1. Casualty Repair. The typical casualty clause — "Landlord shall repair..." — does not work. In condos, the condo board controls the insurance proceeds and the decision as to repair of the structure. This clause should be modified to provide that the landlord will request that the condo board repair any casualty promptly. Depending on the structure of the condo, a savvy tenant's counsel may ask that the landlord's representative on the condo board vote in favor of the repairs.

2. Lease Subordinate to Condo Documents. The lease should expressly state that the lease is subordinate and subject to the condo declaration and require that the tenant comply with existing rules and regulations regarding trash disposal and other operations of the store.

3. Enforcing Condo Board Obligations. The lease should make it clear that the landlord has only limited rights and limited opportunity to effectuate repairs: Typically the condo board has the authority and responsibility to make repairs outside of the retail condo unit. While some tenants may ask for the right to bring an action in the condo unit-owner's name against the condo board if a repair is not made promptly, most landlords reject that request due to the complications. In my experience sophisticated tenants acknowledge that the best the retail-unit landlord can do is to agree to take reasonable steps to enforce the board's obligations.

4. Non-Disturbance Protection from a Condo Default. It is virtually universal in New York City that the rents payable by the retail tenant far exceed the monthly common charges payable by its landlord. A tenant might be concerned, however, about a default by the unit owner in the event of a special assessment by the condo board. Tenants sometimes ask for non-disturbance protection from the condo board.

The more modern documents governing condo regimes sometimes include a provision requiring that the board grant such protection but certainly not all do. If the landlord is unable to obtain a non-disturbance agreement from the condo board, the retail tenant will typically look at the rents being paid to its landlord and the history of common charges paid by its landlord to the condominium and determine that the risk of eviction is very small. 

5. Escalations. The typical escalations need to be adjusted to match the condo structure. For example, the share of tax increases needs to reflect the portion of the demised premises occupied by the tenant in the particular condominium unit.

In sum, landlords and tenants in retail condominium leases and their brokers need to be careful not to use form term sheets and leases which do not adequately address the important differences in operating in a condominium building.

 

Tom Kearns is a partner at Olshan Frome Wolosky. This is adapted from his article at the New York Real Estate Journal.

 

For more, see our Site Map or join our Archive >>

Subscribe

join now

Got elected? Are you on your co-op/condo board?

Then don’t miss a beat! Stories you can use to make your building better, keep it out of trouble, save money, enhance market value, and make your board life a whole lot easier!