The Meter is Running
The Habitat Article Archive includes the full text of all of our
magazine articles dating back to 2002. You can view 3 articles per
month for free. (Repeat views of the same article don’t count
against your monthly limit.)
To read more, purchase a print subscription or a daily or yearly All-Access Pass
and get unlimited access to the Archive. Prices start at 1.95.
You've reached your free article limit for this month.
To read this article and gain unlimited access to the Habitat Article
Archive, which includes the full text of all our magazine articles
dating back to 2002, purchase an All-Access Pass.
41 legal experts on game-changing laws, rules, and cases.
AUTHORMarc Luxemburg, Partner, Gallet Dreyer & Berkey
PAGE #p. 35
Levandusky v. One Fifth Avenue
In 1987, Ronald Levandusky decided to alter the kitchen of his co-op apartment. He was president of the co-op. Levandusky hired a contractor, who severed and jogged the kitchen steam riser although this had not been disclosed in any plans or approved by the board. In august 1988, when the board learned of this, it issued a stop-work order. Levandusky brought suit, claiming the board’s decision not to allow a change in the riser was unreasonable. The court decided the Business Judgment Rule governed the actions of the board.
"Boards have broad authority to manage the affairs of the cooperative or condominium, but their authority is not unlimited, and they have to be careful not to exceed their authority. One of the principal guidelines for board decision-making is the Business Judgment Rule set forth in the Levandusky case. Here, the fundamental rule for boards to follow – in virtually all instances – is made clear."
To read the full lecture, visit: http://bit.ly/MLuxemburg