The Meter is Running
The Habitat Article Archive includes the full text of all of our
magazine articles dating back to 2002. You can view 3 articles per
month for free. (Repeat views of the same article don’t count
against your monthly limit.)
To read more, purchase a print subscription or a daily or yearly All-Access Pass
and get unlimited access to the Archive. Prices start at 1.95.
You've reached your free article limit for this month.
To read this article and gain unlimited access to the Habitat Article
Archive, which includes the full text of all our magazine articles
dating back to 2002, purchase an All-Access Pass.
41 legal experts on game-changing laws, rules, and cases.
AUTHOREric Goidel, Senior Partner, Borah Goldstein Altschuler Nahins & Goidel
PAGE #p. 40
Biondi v. Beekman Hill House Apt. Corp.
This case involved a board member having his request for indemnification from the apartment corporation denied for damages arising out of a federal court case entitled Broome v. Biondi, where a jury found that he, along with several other directors, had discriminated against prospective subtenants. Finding that Biondi acted in bad faith, the New york Court of appeals held that, under such circumstances, indemnification is void against public policy
"The area where boards are most often exposed to legal challenges is in the admissions process. If this process is not conducted in good faith or is tainted by discrimination, boards and board members can lose the protection of the Business Judgment Rule as well as their director and officers insurance coverage. With17 protected classes of individuals in New York City, boards need to adopt an admissions policy and interview protocol that will not place the corporation or board members at risk."
To read the full lecture, visit: http://bit.ly/EGoidel