The Meter is Running
The Habitat Article Archive includes the full text of all of our
magazine articles dating back to 2002. You can view 3 articles per
month for free. (Repeat views of the same article don’t count
against your monthly limit.)
To read more, purchase a print subscription or a daily or yearly All-Access Pass
and get unlimited access to the Archive. Prices start at 1.95.
You've reached your free article limit for this month.
To read this article and gain unlimited access to the Habitat Article
Archive, which includes the full text of all our magazine articles
dating back to 2002, purchase an All-Access Pass.
Boards should learn that in this economy, standard common charge recovery efforts will not suffice.
AUTHORDavid J. Byrne, Herrick, Feinstein
When dealing with unpaid common charges, boards must think outside the box and be open to utilizing all legal means available to them.
A condominium client of ours had a building with abandoned units, some in the midst of bank foreclosure. The unit-owners were scattered among various locations. There were questions as to whether, even if these owners were located, any of them maintained any assets that could be executed. The unpaid common charges connected with these units mounted, generating a growing deficit and jeopardizing the scope and quality of the client’s services and maintenance. We filed foreclosures with respect to the condo liens, and sought and secured rent receiverships, which resulted in tenant-occupied units. The rent was then used to pay the units’ ongoing common charges and pay down the arrearage.
Boards should learn that in this economy, this real estate market, and this ever-changing world, standard, thoughtless, and assembly-line-related common charge management and recovery efforts will not suffice.
When dealing with unpaid common charges, boards must think outside the box and be open to utilizing all of the legal means available to them – regardless of how unorthodox.