The Meter is Running
The Habitat Article Archive includes the full text of all of our
magazine articles dating back to 2002. You can view 3 articles per
month for free. (Repeat views of the same article don’t count
against your monthly limit.)
To read more, purchase a print subscription or a daily or yearly All-Access Pass
and get unlimited access to the Archive. Prices start at 1.95.
You've reached your free article limit for this month.
To read this article and gain unlimited access to the Habitat Article
Archive, which includes the full text of all our magazine articles
dating back to 2002, purchase an All-Access Pass.
41 legal experts on game-changing laws, rules, and cases.
AUTHORStewart Wurtzel, Partner, Tane Waterman & Wurtzel
PAGE #p. 42
McMunn v. Steppingstone ManagemenT Corp.
This case revolves around the question of who is responsible for repairs inside an apartment when the city issues code violations – the shareholder or the co-op board? In this case, the co-op board and its management company argued that the shareholder was responsible for curing the violations because the obligations were expressly set forth in the proprietary lease. The city argued that the Housing Maintenance Code takes precedence over the proprietary lease. The court agreed with the city, ruling that the law holds the building owner – the co-op corporation – responsible for the repairs but that the co-op corporation might have a financial claim against the shareholder to recover the cost of those repairs.
"Your co-op board has just received a notice from the New York City Department of Housing Preservation and Development informing you that there are violations in apartment 3B for failing to paint and plaster. Your reaction is that it’s the shareholder’s responsibility to cure the violations, so you’re not going to do the work. You’re making a big mistake."
To read the full lecture, visit: http://bit.ly/SWurtzel