The Meter is Running
The Habitat Article Archive includes the full text of all of our
magazine articles dating back to 2002. You can view 3 articles per
month for free. (Repeat views of the same article don’t count
against your monthly limit.)
To read more, purchase a print subscription or a daily or yearly All-Access Pass
and get unlimited access to the Archive. Prices start at 1.95.
You've reached your free article limit for this month.
To read this article and gain unlimited access to the Habitat Article
Archive, which includes the full text of all our magazine articles
dating back to 2002, purchase an All-Access Pass.
How to collect common charges from a delinquent shareholder.
AUTHORRonald A. Sher, Himmelfarb & Sher
Condo boards need to know their rights and the processes available to them to collect common charges from recalcitrant shareholders, even when said shareholders are in foreclosure.
Himmelfarb & Sher
Ronald A. Sher, Partner
The board of managers of a condominium had a serious common charge collection problem caused by a defaulting unit-owner. There was no equity in the unit since it was purchased at the top of the market and the mortgage exceeded its current value. The condominium filed a notice of lien against the unit-owner in an effort to enforce its rights and remedies pursuant to the bylaws. The bank of the unit-owner had also begun a foreclosure proceeding to enforce its security interest against the unit based upon the mortgage. The foreclosing lender was intentionally delaying the case and failed to proceed in a timely manner by conducting the foreclosure sale. The conduct of the lender was both dilatory and deliberate since the delay was excessive and unreasonable and caused an undue financial hardship to the condominium. The lender has a superior lien to the condominium by statute, and the foreclosure sale extinguishes the lien and discharges the rights of the condominium to receive the outstanding arrears. Accordingly, the foreclosing bank is not responsible for the payment of common charges to the condo until after the completion of the foreclosure sale. Therefore, the failure and/or refusal of the lender to proceed with the foreclosure sale in a timely manner and be obligated to remit payment of common charges to the condominium was causing a deficiency with the operating budget, which had to be funded by the other unit-owners.
We started litigation on behalf of the condominium against the foreclosing lender, alleging that the dilatory tactics and delaying strategy constituted improper and unreasonable conduct. The court determined that since “a foreclosure proceeding is one in equity,” the condominium is entitled to have the matter concluded within a reasonable time. Therefore, the continued delays and failure to comply with the court order directing the lender to complete the foreclosure sale in a timely manner, resulted in the lender being forced to take responsibility to remit common charges to the condominium prior to the completion of the foreclosure sale. The lender has been remitting payments to the condo for an extensive time period despite the fact that the lender has been unable to hold the sale due to its apparent inability to comply with requirements of the office of court administration relative to foreclosures.
The condominium has certain rights and remedies available that must be asserted and enforced to protect its financial integrity, including commencement of litigation against the lender engaged in dilatory trial tactics. Also, the condominium has the ability to aggressively pursue unit-owners in arrears by obtaining a money judgment against the unit-owner and expeditiously proceeding with a sheriff’s sale to get a deed to the unit, thereby enabling it to rent the unit and offset common charge arrears.