New York's Cooperative and Condominium Community
The Habitat Article Archive includes the full text of all of our magazine articles dating back to 2002. You can view 3 articles per month for free. (Repeat views of the same article don’t count against your monthly limit.)
To read more, purchase a print subscription or a daily or yearly All-Access Pass and get unlimited access to the Archive. Prices start at 1.95.
Already a subscriber? Sign In to access!
To read this article and gain unlimited access to the Habitat Article Archive, which includes the full text of all our magazine articles dating back to 2002, purchase an All-Access Pass.
Already a subscriber? Sign In to access!
A renter is poorly treated by a co-op.
A renter's wife encounters many difficulties when trying to sell her co-op, which leads the couple to vow to never buy a co-op again.
RENTER, 98 RIVERSIDE DRIVE
Seller to Board: Never Again
I’ll never live in a co-op. Not that I didn’t think about it. Well, I did more than think about it. I almost became a cooperator, thanks to my second wife.
Growing up in Manhattan, I had lived in rentals my whole life, and when I got married in the early ’80s, my wife had a wonderful deal on a rent-controlled apartment on Manhattan’s Upper West Side. We lived there happily for years until she died suddenly. After that, I continued to live there and eventually brought my second wife, Liz, to live there, too.
There was a complication: Liz already owned a co-op apartment on Cabrini Boulevard in Washington Heights. We tried living in both places, spending weekends in our co-op and weekdays in our rental. That made me a cooperative owner, of sorts (or at least, the husband of a cooperative owner). But eventually, for convenience and size, we liked my rental apartment better and decided to sell my wife’s co-op.
In February 2005, we took initial steps to put Liz’s apartment on the market with a local Hudson Heights realtor. Before long, we had a prospective buyer, a female professor at Columbia University. Our asking price was $359,000.
The woman met with the co-op board. She had submitted what seemed like pounds of paperwork, showing how strong her financial picture was, along with sterling character references. I had heard how tough some co-op boards were, but neither Liz nor I expected any trouble. After all, my wife had been a long-time model resident and our potential buyer seemed perfect.
We waited...and waited...and waited for the board’s decision. Finally, some four months later, we were told that our buyer had been rejected. No further explanation was forthcoming, and neither the head of the co-op board nor the managing agent had the courtesy to return our calls. My wife tried everything to get in touch with the board president – calling, writing, putting a message in the co-op board complaint box, even going to her door. But she received no answer or communication from her whatsoever.
All we wanted to know was what had we done wrong? Our buyer’s finances were impeccable, her references excellent. Shouldn’t the board at the very least have given us some hint as to why she had been turned down so that we would know what kind of resident was acceptable? And why did it take the board four months to come to a decision? Even Congress moves faster than that.
We inquired around among other co-op owners we knew, and they told us that the co-op board was not required to give us any explanation of its decision, a fact I still find unbelievable. I am told boards are worried about lawsuits; to my mind, they should worry about the resale value of their buildings. If they get a reputation as erratic or idiosyncratic, why would any broker bring a potential buyer to them?
That’s probably what happened to us when we tried to find another buyer. Although we were stunned by the rejection we had dutifully put the apartment back on the market. But from August 2005 until September 2006, our unit went unsold, partly, I suspect, because most brokers were wary of this board and this building. For us, however, it was bizarre, almost Kafkaesque. For more than a year, we had to pay mortgage fees and carrying charges on an apartment we no longer needed or wanted. Needless to say, it cost us a lot of money and grief.
The apartment was finally sold when a realtor found a couple whom the co-op board (miraculously) approved. It still took them months to get to that decision. We finally sold the apartment for $309,000. That’s a full $50,000 less than we would have gotten if our original buyer had been approved.
We still don’t know why she wasn’t and we wonder: why do co-op boards and managing agents feel they can stonewall co-op owners who have legitimate concerns? Shouldn’t a board, at the very least, try to move quickly on a decision? If they’re not going to give an okay – and I understand that financial concerns are the paramount issue – shouldn’t they at least do that with all deliberate speed? Boards: have a heart! And you’d think it would only enhance the value of a building to have a no-nonsense approval process.
Certainly, the whole saga left a bad taste in my mouth, as I’m sure similar situations have to other sellers (and buyers). People may say cooperative living is wonderful, but I have only two words to say about co-op ownership: never again.
Learn all the basics of NYC co-op and condo management, with straight talk from heavy hitters in the field of co-op or condo apartments
Professionals in some of the key fields of co-op and condo board governance and building management answer common questions in their areas of expertise
Got elected? Are you on your co-op/condo board?
Then don’t miss a beat! Stories you can use to make your building better, keep it out of trouble, save money, enhance market value, and make your board life a whole lot easier!